Olivares v. Pineda (2019)

Citation: Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
Parent Document: Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2019-09-25
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4664364/olivares-v-pineda/ ↗

Full Text

672 chars

14
              3. Evidentiary Objections
       Finally, the attorney defendants contend the trial court erred in overruling most of
their evidentiary objections. However, they make no attempt to explain how the claimed
evidentiary errors—most of which pertained to inconsequential statements in the
challenged declarations that had no apparent impact on the trial court’s ruling—resulted
in a miscarriage of justice. (Christ v. Schwartz (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 440, 446–447;
Evid. Code, § 353, subd. (b).)
                                       DISPOSITION
       The order denying the special motion to strike is affirmed. Plaintiffs shall recover
their costs on appeal.

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Full Text