Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Citation
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Parent Document
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-09-25
Other Sections in This Document (34)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
- Olivares v. Pineda (2019)
Full Text
480 chars7
The attorney defendants interpret the first rent ledger as showing $3,750 in unpaid
rent. They reach this total by “excluding any possible credit for the $2,000 security
deposit,” even though the ledger expressly states that the security deposit was applied on
July 1. In any event, plaintiffs’ evidence that they were not credited for payments
totaling $6,800 was sufficient to raise a triable issue that the unlawful detainer could not
succeed based on the July notice.