Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Citation
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Parent Document
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1993-12-07
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6103695/brusco-v-braun/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (33)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
- Brusco v. Braun, 199 A.D.2d 27 (1993)
Full Text
815 charsThe evil sought to be avoided by the imposition of consistent procedure was articulated by Appellate Term, First Department in Central Park Gardens v Ramos (NYLJ, Apr. 9, 1984, at 12, col 6), in which the court stated that "uniform rules of civil procedure and substantive law must be applied so as to avoid an intolerable spectacle of matters being determined more upon the basis of which judge may be presiding in a given case than upon the basis of such uniform rules of civil procedure and substantive law.” In the matter at bar, the scheduling of inquest more than one month after judgment was requested by petitioner evaded the time limits imposed by RPAPL 732, allowing the defaulting tenant to forestall determination of the proceeding considerably longer than if she had appeared in answer to the petition.