Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 903 F.3d 32 (2018)

Citation
Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 903 F.3d 32 (2018)
Parent Document
Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 903 F.3d 32 (2018)
Effective Date
2018-08-31

Other Sections in This Document (144)

Full Text

633 chars
9
serious or repeated violation of the terms and conditions of the
lease, for violation of applicable Federal, State, or local law, or
for other good cause.” 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(o)(7)(C) (emphasis
added). Under the plain language of this provision, Harvey’s
termination rights were limited “during the term of the [Hayes
family’s] lease.” Id. After the lease term expires, so do these
protections. Of course, Harvey had an incentive to renew the
Hayes family’s lease, given that he was receiving market-rate
rent. And, indeed, he did renew the lease multiple times. But
nothing compels him to do so continuously. II. Statutory history