Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 903 F.3d 32 (2018)

Citation
Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 903 F.3d 32 (2018)
Parent Document
Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 903 F.3d 32 (2018)
Effective Date
2018-08-31

Other Sections in This Document (144)

Full Text

488 chars
unambiguous . . . we ordinarily do not consider statutory
purpose or legislative history.” Hesketh, 828 F.3d at 167.
Here, we include a brief discussion of purpose and legislative
history solely to demonstrate why Congress would have chosen
to enact this particular language—to show that this is not a case
where “literal application of the statute will produce a result
demonstrably at odds with the intention of its drafters.” Id.
(quoting In re Segal, 57 F.3d 342, 346 (3d Cir. 1995)).