Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Freddie Douglas v. Metro Rental Services, Inc., 827 F.2d 252 (1987)

Citation
Freddie Douglas v. Metro Rental Services, Inc., 827 F.2d 252 (1987)
Parent Document
Freddie Douglas v. Metro Rental Services, Inc., 827 F.2d 252 (1987)
Effective Date
1987-08-26

Other Sections in This Document (49)

Full Text

416 chars
Metro claims that the judgment against it should be vacated because its president, defendant Wolf, who actually dealt with the plaintiffs, prevailed with the jury. Therefore, Metro argues, the judgment of liability against Metro is inconsistent with Wolf’s favorable jury verdict and must be vacated. The magistrate concluded that the two results were not inconsistent, relying on In re Uranium Antitrust Litigation,