Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Howe v. ALD Services, Inc., 941 S.W.2d 645 (1997)

Citation
Howe v. ALD Services, Inc., 941 S.W.2d 645 (1997)
Parent Document
Howe v. ALD Services, Inc., 941 S.W.2d 645 (1997)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1997-02-11

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

453 chars
After examining the record, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial or landlord’s motion for a new trial. Although counsel’s question regarding Howe’s relationship with his attorney may have been improper, it was not manifestly inflammatory nor prejudicial that a mistrial was required. The trial court is in a better position to assess the prejudicial effect of the attorney’s question. Point two is denied.