Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Citation
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2013-08-22
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5147069/clark-v-bridges/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (34)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
- Clark v. Bridges, 75 A.3d 149 (2013)
Full Text
583 charsThis conclusion compels another: The five-day time period provided for in D.C. Appellate Rule 4(a)(6) is no longer triggered by Superior Court Civil Rule 77(d). As noted previously, the additional five-day period applies only when “a rule of the Superior Court requires service ... to be made by mail.” D.C.App. R. 4(a)(6) (emphasis added).4 Since the more per*153missive Superior Court rule no longer contains any such requirement, we cannot read D.C. Appellate Rule 4(a)(6) to defer the effective date, for the purposes of appeal in a civil case, of entry of an order or judgment.5