Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Citation
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Parent Document
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2007-02-15
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
Full Text
748 charsThe landlord does not claim res judicata (claim preclusion) based on the tenant's decision not to appeal the judgment of possession, and thus we do not address that issue. We review on the merits and agree with the tenant. When one is sued for lease violation A, and that matter is settled before trial, one cannot be tried for lease violation B without a complaint filed and notice served spelling it out simply because lease violation B may exist. The landlord and trial court, however, believed that the tenant, who had been sued repeatedly for back rent, was on notice of his breach of the covenant to pay rent in advance and when due, and that the complaint for March rent (apparently implicitly) embraced that broader, alternative theory.