Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Citation
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Parent Document
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2007-02-15
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
- Luskey v. BORGER MANAGEMENT INC., 917 A.2d 631 (2007)
Full Text
629 charsI concur in the judgment, for I agree that the landlord’s complaint in the action for possession alleged only that the tenant had failed to pay a single month’s rent, and nothing more. The tenant thus had no notice of any other claim, and the judgment in the landlord’s favor, based on a claim that was not before the trial court, was erroneous. As the per curiam opinion suggests, the trial court and the landlord were in error in asserting that any claim other than the one alleged in the landlord’s complaint could support the judgment for possession. Accordingly, we must reverse the summary judgment in the landlord’s favor.