State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Citation: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Parent Document: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2009-02-26
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4946203/state-v-drake/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (28)

State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Full Text

606 chars

The relevant provision states, “If any person required to register pursuant to this section does not have a fixed residence, it is an affirmative defense to the charge of failure to register, that he or she provided written notice to the sheriff of the county where he or she last registered within forty-eight hours excluding weekends and holidays after ceasing to have a fixed residence and has subsequently complied with the requirements of subsections (4)(a)(vii) or (viii) and (6) of this section. To prevail, the person must prove the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.” RCW 9A.44.130(6)(c).