State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Citation: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Parent Document: State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Effective Date: 2009-02-26
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4946203/state-v-drake/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (28)

State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)
State v. Drake, 149 Wash. App. 88 (2009)

Full Text

207 chars

¶20 The State notes that Mr. Drake did not attempt to prove the homelessness affirmative defense provided by the statute.3 RCW 9A.44.130(6)(c). That is immaterial because the State failed to meet its burden.