Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)

Citation
State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
Parent Document
State v. Hemingway, 196 Vt. 441 (2014)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2014-05-09

Other Sections in This Document (105)

Full Text

644 chars
18 U.S.C. § 3583(f).  All the
circuits to consider the issue have held that the “ultimate goal” of this
statute is to provide notice to the defendant, and, therefore, if the defendant
has actual notice of the condition he is charged with violating, then the
statute’s purpose is satisfied, and any error in providing a written statement
is harmless.  See United States v. Felix, 994 F.2d 550, 551-52 (8th
Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Arbizu, 431 F.3d 469, 470-71 (5th
Cir. 2005) (per curiam); United States v. Ortega-Brito, 311 F.3d 1136,
1138 (9th Cir. 2002); United States v. Ramos-Santiago, 925 F.2d 15, 17
(1st Cir. 1991).