Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/857088.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
Full Text
1,720 charsthe company” did not constitute protected oppositional conduct under Title VII because it “so interfere[d] with the employee’s performance of her job that it render[ed] her ineffective in the position for which she was employed.” Id. at 1139- 44 (citing Rosser v. Laborers’ Int’l Union of N. Am., Local No. 438, 616 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1980)). This federal authority is unpersuasive because, as explained above, our court has expressly disavowed such a standard that would require HR, management, and legal employees to prioritize their duty to insulate the company from legal liability over their desire to eliminate and prevent discrimination in the workplace. See Lodis, 172 Wn. App. at 851. Additionally, Bittner merely suggested to other employees that they seek legal advice—he did not recruit them to do so—and this conduct did not so interfere with the performance of his job that it rendered him ineffective as an RVP. On this record, Gogel is inapposite. Symetra also claims that “[t]he record does not support Bittner’s claim that he opposed discrimination on behalf of others” because “nothing beyond Bittner’s assertions in this lawsuit supports that” claim. This argument misrepresents the record and misunderstands Bittner’s burden of production to survive a motion for summary judgment. “[O]n summary judgment a nonmoving party’s declaration must be taken as true and can create a genuine issue of material fact even if it is ‘self-serving.’” Mackey, 12 Wn. App. 2d at 575; see also Haley v. Amazon.com Servs., LLC, 25 Wn. App. 2d 207, 220, 522 P.3d 80 (2022) (“[C]lassifying a party’s - 15 - For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85708-8-I