Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/857088.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 857088.pdf
Full Text
1,742 charsManning or work it out herself,” and Manning, in turn, accused Rotz of acting improperly during a sale. When Rotz told Bittner how Symetra had responded to her complaint, Bitter told her, “[Y]ou need to get legal advice. This isn’t right.” Symetra fired Rotz in February 2015, and she then sued Symetra alleging, among other claims, that it unlawfully harassed and discriminated against her on the basis of gender. Rotz and Symetra settled this lawsuit in 2016. 1 Because the principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting in part Symetra’s motion for summary judgment, the facts herein are set forth in the light most favorable to Bittner, the non-moving party, based on the evidence submitted on summary judgment. See Blue Diamond Grp., Inc. v. KB Seattle 1, Inc., 163 Wn. App. 449, 453, 266 P.3d 881 (2011). -2- For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85708-8-I A similar incident occurred with a Symetra Regional Sales Executive, Jane Doe. 2 In 2014, Doe confided in Bittner that her manager, Chris Koettker, was sexually harassing her. As he did with Rotz, Bittner reported the behavior to HR and encouraged Doe to do the same, which she did. Symetra did not investigate Doe’s complaints, and Symetra’s Executive Vice President, Michael Fry, told Bittner to “take [his] nose out of other managers’ business and to mind the matters in [his] own division.” When Doe expressed her frustration with Symetra’s failure to respond meaningfully to her complaint, Bittner told her she should “seek legal advice and find out what she can do.” Doe subsequently left Symetra and then sent a demand letter to the company accusing it of subjecting her to sexual