Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)

Citation: Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)
Parent Document: Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2011-09-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8093357/harrington-v-metropolis-propert... ↗

Full Text

491 chars

In its analysis of the petitioner’s statutory claims, the trial court determined that Metropolis was a proper respondent to those claims because “landlord,” as defined in RSA 540-A: 1 and :5, includes agents of the lessor. The petitioner argues that because the trial court determined that, in this sense, Metropolis was a “landlord,” and because BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY states that a “[l]andlord” is “[ajlso called ‘Lessor,’ ” Metropolis was a lessor and thus a party to the lease agreement.

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text