Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)

Citation
Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)
Parent Document
Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)
Jurisdiction
New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date
2011-09-22

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text

579 chars
The petitioner next argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his claim that Metropolis violated his statutory right to quiet enjoyment. See RSA 540-A:2 (2007). In particular, the petitioner contends that (1) in ruling that Metropolis did not willfully violate his right to quiet enjoyment, the trial court relied on an incorrect factual determination as to when Metropolis offered the petitioner a new apartment, and (2) the trial court errone*480ously shifted the burden of proof to the petitioner when it found that there was no loss of use of the premises. We disagree.