Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)

Citation: Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)
Parent Document: Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc., 162 N.H. 476 (2011)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2011-09-22
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8093357/harrington-v-metropolis-propert... ↗

Full Text

506 chars

The petitioner first argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his claim for the return of his security deposit. He claims that, by operation of certain provisions of RSA chapters 540 and 540-A, the lease term requiring sixty days’ notice to terminate the tenancy is null and void, that he was only required to give thirty days’ notice to terminate the lease, and that he is entitled to the return of his security deposit, plus statutory damages. The petitioner’s argument misapprehends the statutes.

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text