Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 841190.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 841190.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,771 chars
SHERWOOD AUBURN LLC,
DIVISION ONE
Respondent,
No. 84119-0-I
v.
PUBLISHED OPINION
JOEL PINZON and ROSA MENDEZ,

Appellants.

DWYER, J. — When a landlord has accepted the financial benefits of

certain federal programs, Congress is authorized pursuant to the Constitution’s

Spending Clause1 to impose on that landlord rules, regulations, or restrictions

premised on the landlord’s participation in such a program. The Supremacy

Clause2 of the Constitution makes such laws paramount to those enacted by

state legislatures. In the federal CARES Act, 3 Congress mandated that landlords

who have accepted certain federal financial benefits must provide to tenants

living in covered housing units a 30-day notice to cure the rental payment

deficiency or vacate the premises before the landlord may commence an eviction

action.

1
U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 1.
2
U.S. CONST. art. VI, cl. 2.
3
See Pub. L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020); see also 15 U.S.C. § 9058.
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.
No. 84119-0-I/2

Here, the notice provided to tenants Joel Pinzon and Rosa Mendez by

landlord Sherwood Auburn LLC, did not comply with the federal CARES Act.

The landlord nevertheless filed an unlawful detainer action against the tenants.

Because Sherwood Auburn did not comply with the CARES Act notice

requirement, the superior court was without the authority to issue a writ of

restitution or enter judgment against Pinzon and Mendez. Accordingly, we

reverse the superior court’s order so doing.

I

Pinzon and Mendez began renting an apartment owned by Sherwood

Auburn in May 2019. They lived in the apartment with their four young children.

Pinzon has worked in construction his whole life. During the COVID-19