Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/726668.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 726668.pdf
Full Text
1,745 charsa "documented oral reprimand." Marin promptly filed a union grievance of the
reprimand. The County later investigated the incident, concluded that the
reprimand was based on a misunderstanding, and withdrew it.1
In June, Marin complained to WDT's human resources department (HR),
alleging a hostile work environment. The County hired an independent
investigator, Karen Sutherland, to investigate these complaints. She found no
evidence to support Marin's accusations.
The same month, following his conflict with Sagnis, Marin requested, and
the County granted, a transfer to Jim Alenduff's C Crew at the South Plant in
Renton. This assignment was initially temporary. Meanwhile, that October,
Sagnis told an HR staff member that Marin had "shit all over the crew" and "it
would not be pleasant" if he returned. The County gave Sagnis a written
reprimand for threatening retaliation against Marin.
Like other West Point operators, Marin considered South Plant a desirable
assignment because of its more convenient location. Because of the size of
South Plant and its differences from West Point, however, Marin needed training
to be proficient in the new plant. At his crew's request, Alenduff restricted
1 The County withdrew the reprimand in March 2010.
-3-
No. 72666-8-1 / 4
Marin's work duties while his assignment was temporary. He later explained that
Marin repeatedly made errors on C Crew that put crew members in "jeopardy."
In response, Marin complained to HR that he was not receiving
meaningful assignments, the crew did not want him working in their areas, and
they were aggressive toward him when he made mistakes. Marin alleged that