Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)

Citation
Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
Parent Document
Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2000-04-18

Other Sections in This Document (41)

Full Text

721 chars
The plaintiff next claims that the court improperly found that the promissory note was unenforceable and rendered judgment for the defendants on count one of the amended complaint. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly relied on Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc., 42 Mass. App. 162, 675 N.E.2d 403, review denied, 424 Mass. 1108, 678 N.E.2d 1334 (1997), in deciding this claim. A resolution of this claim requires us, in part, to review the court’s findings of fact, which we review under the clearly erroneous standard; Powers v. Olson, 252 Conn. 98, 104-105, 742 A.2d 799 (2000); and to determine whether the court properly determined that Hastings Associates, Inc., governs this case.