Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)

Citation
Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
Parent Document
Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2000-04-18

Other Sections in This Document (41)

Full Text

931 chars
The crux of the plaintiffs claim is that the court misconstrued the lease provision. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly read into the lease the requirement of a transfer of the liquor license. The plaintiff claims that under the unambiguous lan*324guage of the lease provision, there is no requirement that a transfer of the liquor license occur, and that the court improperly relied on statements made surrounding the creation of the lease. According to the plaintiff, the lease implicitly requires that if the tenant wants to terminate the lease, it must notify the landlord for the security deposit to be returned. The plaintiff claims that the lease provision created a condition subsequent requiring some confirmatory act on the part of the defendants, and that because the defendants failed to notify the plaintiff of their intent to terminate the lease, the lease remained in full force and effect.