Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Citation
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-04-18
Other Sections in This Document (41)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Zenon v. R. E. Yeagher Management Corp., 57 Conn. App. 316 (2000)
- Section 181
Full Text
1,100 charsClause 37.2 of the lease does not contain a notice or other requirement prior to termination of the lease. The fact that other provisions of the lease contained such language of condition subsequent indicates that clause 37.2 was not intended to contain such language. The court properly found that the language in the lease was a conditional limitation, which caused the lease to terminate upon the occurrence of the contingency, namely, the failure of a liquor license to be in the tenant’s name and in use within three months of the commencement of the lease. This interpretation is consistent with the language, background and purpose of the lease. Yeagher, through his corporation, intended *327to operate a pub style facility on the premises, and it was essential to the operation of such facility that Yeagher be able to serve alcoholic beverages. It is evident that the intent of the parties, as manifested by the language used in the lease, was to terminate the arrangement in the event that the defendants could not serve alcohol on the premises, and thus, not operate a pub style facility.