HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)

Citation: HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Parent Document: HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-01-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2326384/haslam-james-v-lawrence/ ↗

Full Text

627 chars

“Whether the defendant is subject to CUTPA is a question of law, not fact. . . . [W]hether a defendant’s acts constitute . . . deceptive or unfair trade practices under CUTPA, is a question of fact for the trier, to which, on appellate review, we accord our customary deference. . . . [W]here the factual basis of the court’s decision is challenged we must determine whether the facts set out in the memorandum of decision are supported by the evidence or whether, in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the whole record, those facts are clearly erroneous.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Szekeres

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text