INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)

Citation
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Parent Document
HASLAM-JAMES v. Lawrence, 35 A.3d 368 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2012-01-31
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2326384/haslam-james-v-lawrence/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (50)

Full Text

442 chars 
The court articulated, as to the first count of the amended complaint, that the defendant entered the apartment and changed the locks at a time when the plaintiff was still the actual possessor of the property. The court further found that “[a]fter being made aware that the plaintiff was still in possession of the premises, there was a delay by the defendant in providing the plaintiff with access to the premises to remove her belongings.”