Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)

Citation
Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
Parent Document
Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1997-03-04

Full Text

706 chars
The record is clear that the trial court, on October 24,1994, granted the plaintiffs motion for judgment on the attorney referee’s report that was docketed as entry number 121. No further action was required by the trial court. This same motion then came up on the short calendar on November 7. The trial court gratuitously *387noted, “Approved: Judgment per ATR Report, Stanley, J., 11/8/94. See order at #121.” Because the defendant’s motion to open, filed March 2, 1994, was filed more than four months after the date that judgment was rendered, the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear it and, therefore, properly denied it. The judgment is affirmed. In this opinion the other judges concurred.