Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)

Citation
Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
Parent Document
Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1997-03-04

Full Text

936 chars
The defendant concedes that she received notice of this default and, thereafter, filed a pro se appearance with the court listing the following as her address: “c/o Eurotest Laboratories Ltd., Mathews Drive, P.O. Box 262, East Haddam, CT., 06423.” The defendant did not, however, file any pleadings. On August 17, 1992, the plaintiff filed a motion for default against the defendant for failure to plead. This motion was improperly denied on August 18, 1992, on the basis of the mistaken belief that the defendant had a proper answer on file in the matter. On November 24,1992, the court, realizing that an error had been made, sent notice to the parties informing them: “The track having expired in this case, the following orders are entered: Defendant Irma Langhorst is defaulted for failure to plead. The case is ordered placed on the non-jury trial list for assignment at a later date. Per order of the court, Arena, J., 11/24/92.”