Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Citation
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Parent Document
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1997-03-04
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
- Reich v. Langhorst, 44 Conn. App. 381 (1997)
Full Text
458 charsFOTI, J. The defendant1 appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to open a default judgment rendered against her. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied her motion as untimely and (2) abused its discretion in denying the motion on the ground that she had not demonstrated that she was prevented from presenting her defenses because of mistake, accident or other reasonable cause. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.