Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Section 47a-21

Citation
Section 47a-21
Parent Document
Fitzpatrick v. Scalzi, 72 Conn. App. 779 (2002)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2002-10-08

Full Text

575 chars
Our Supreme Court has determined that CUTPA is applicable to residential landlord-tenant transactions. See Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484, 464 A.2d 847 (1983). General Statutes § 42-110b (d) also provides: “It is the intention of the legislature that this chapter be remedial and be so construed.” Also, our Supreme Court has held “that CUTPA is remedial in character . . . and must be liberally construed in favor of those whom the legislature intended to benefit.” (Internal quotation marks omitted). Service Road Corp. v. Quinn, 241 Conn. 630, 637, 698 A.2d 258 (1997).