Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Citation
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-11-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7912426/johnson-v-mazza/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
779 chars“The standard of review in an appeal challenging a trial court’s granting of a motion to strike is well established. A motion to strike challenges the legal sufficiency of a pleading, and, consequently, requires no factual findings by the trial court. As a result, our review of the court’s ruling is plenary. . . . We take the facts to be those alleged in the complaint that has been stricken and we construe the complaint in the manner most favorable to sustaining its legal sufficiency. . . . Thus, [i]f facts provable in the complaint would support a cause of action, the motion to strike must be denied.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Jewish Home for the Elderly of Fairfield County, Inc. v. Cantore, 257 Conn. 531, 537-38, 778 A.2d 93 (2001). *159A