Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)

Citation
Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
Parent Document
Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2003-11-11

Full Text

326 chars
The plaintiff initially claims that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to strike the claim for the return of the security deposit and for double damages pursuant to § 47a-21. We disagree with the plaintiffs claim regarding double damages, but agree with the claim regarding the return of the security deposit.