ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- Citation
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- Parent Document
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-05-13
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
- ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
Full Text
702 charsThe trial court properly rejected the defendant’s claim that he had a right
to cure his nonpayment of rent, as the unambiguous language of the parties’
lease provided that the defendant’s failure to pay his rent on the first of the
month or within nine days thereafter would constitute a default under the
lease and he would immediately forfeit all rights to occupy the apartment,
clearly indicating that there was no right to cure once the defendant
defaulted, and, once the notice to quit had been served on him, any payments
he made were for use and occupancy only. Argued February 18—officially released May 13, 2025 Procedural History