Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)

Citation
ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
Parent Document
ECR 2 LLC v. Thompson (2025)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2025-05-13

Full Text

720 chars
The defendant’s claim that the trial court violated his right to due process
         in denying his motion for a continuance of the trial and in refusing to
         consider his motion to preclude certain evidence was unavailing, as he failed
         to identify, either to the trial court or in his brief to this court, which of his
         due process rights were violated, his identification of those rights for the
         first time during oral argument to this court was improper, and the record
         was inadequate to review any challenge to the trial court’s decision not to
         consider his proposed motion to preclude, as the defendant failed to preserve
         the record by filing the motion.