Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Taylor v. Beaudry, 82 Mass. App. Ct. 105 (2012)

Citation
Taylor v. Beaudry, 82 Mass. App. Ct. 105 (2012)
Parent Document
Taylor v. Beaudry, 82 Mass. App. Ct. 105 (2012)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2012-07-09

Other Sections in This Document (67)

Full Text

588 chars
Consequently, on reconsideration the judge should not only have vacated the award of rent for that one day under G. L. c. 186, § 3, but, as the tenant asked, the judge should also have vacated his finding that the tenant occupied the premises on September 1, 2007, and his conclusion, following from that finding, that the $871.67 portion of the security deposit was “retum[ed]” within thirty days of the termination of the tenancy. The case must thus be remanded for entry of an additional damages award of $871.67 trebled plus interest, less the amount initially received by the tenant.