Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Showing 1–4 of 4 results

Section 70-33-433

Westview v. Lockhart & Greener MT v. Cunningham, 2023 MT 201 (2023) Montana state

...notice periods of the various subsections clearly illustrate that the subsections of § 70-33-433(1)(l-m), MCA, are not constrained by a tenant’s violation. Subsections (a-k) require at most 30 days’ notice prior to eviction, while...

Section 70-33-433

Westview v. Lockhart & Greener MT v. Cunningham, 2023 MT 201 (2023) Montana state

...notice periods of the various subsections clearly illustrate that the subsections of § 70-33-433(1)(l-m), MCA, are not constrained by a tenant’s violation. Subsections (a-k) require at most 30 days’ notice prior to eviction, while...

Swenson v. Decock (1994)

Swenson v. Decock (1994) Montana state

...Demanding $374, nearly twenty times what was actually owed, did not constitute proper or correct notice. Thus, the fifteen-day period did not begin to run. We conclude the District Court properly quashed the eviction and properly determined that the...

McCarthy v. State Bank of Townsend, 54 Mont. 319 (1918)

McCarthy v. State Bank of Townsend, 54 Mont. 319 (1918) Montana state

...At all times during this period McCarthy was ignorant of any defect in the proceedings or of anything that would affect the validity of the judgment and sale; he believed that both were valid, and that by means of the...