Showing 41–60 of 83 results
Without any reply from Appellants concerning the ramp, Respondents returned to Villa Roma on February 16, 2010, when they completed and signed a lease application, paid a $25 application fee, and paid a $100 security deposit. Respondents believed the security...
...PESI alleged further that if it returned the townhouse in the same condition as when the lease was signed the defendants promised to refund the security deposit, that PESI did return the townhouse in the same condition and that the...
...The court ruled that appellants had not offered substantial, competent evidence of any misapplication of the security deposit, and further held the claim for a return of the deposit to be limited in damages by § 535.00, RSMo 1986. The...
. The appellant, in his brief, contends that all of these rights of fraud, violation of the Merchandising Practices Act, wrongful failure to return a security deposit, breach of contract and prima facie
...Kim was referred to respondent’s president, Gibson, who refused the request for expenses and told her that the deposit was not being returned because it was being used for rent until the apartment was re-rented. The security deposit...
...This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s claim for return of a security deposit pursuant to § 535.300 RSMo (1986).
On June 15, Ms. Tolliver and her roommate vacated the apartment. Ms. Tolliver did not pay full or partial rent for the month of June. Appellant subsequently terminated the 2017 lease and did not return the security deposit.
...Catón, respondent, denying his claim for damages for the respondent’s failure to return his lease security deposit in accordance with § 535.300, RSMo 1994. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
...in default on the monthly rentals, then the Ten Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($10,000.00) security deposit may be returned to the Lessee after Lessor has had a reasonable time to inspect the premises after Lessee vacate same...
After remand, defendants filed a motion to dismiss Counts I, II, IV and V, with prejudice, on the grounds that § 535.300 provides the exclusive remedy for wrongful failure to return a security deposit. The trial court sustained the defendants...
...In that answer, Tenant included a counterclaim for the return of her $100 security deposit, which she alleged had been wrongfully withheld. Trial was held on June 24, 1993. The trial court entered its judgment finding in favor of Landlord...
...The statute describes the landlord’s right to demand and receive a security deposit, but also imposes certain duties on him, including the return of the deposit at the termination of the tenancy. The statute is remedial because it was...
Subsequently, Footwear demanded that Katzenberg return the $8,160, which Footwear tendered as the first month’s rent and security deposit. Katzenberg refused to return the money. Footwear filed a two-count petition in St. Louis County Circuit Court, seeking...
In its first point, lessor contends that the trial court erred in returning the security deposit to lessee because § 535.300, RSMo (1986) applies not to commercial leases, but only to residential leases.
Sales, Inc., (PESI), filed a five count petition against the landlords-defendants, alleging fraud, unlawful practices, wrongful failure to return a security deposit, breach of contract and prima facie tort. PESI appeals the trial court’s dismissal of Counts I...
...Owners returned the $290 security deposit. They were unsuccessful in securing replacement renters and the condominium remained vacant during the Kimack rental period until February 28th when Owners occupied it for five days to perform repairs and maintenance. Kimack again...
...was restricted to the uses of the deposit, except it could pledge the deposit as security for a loan to pave and stripe the parking lot, and “Lessor shall return the foregoing deposit with interest to the Lessee at the...
...an additional $14,485 in late charges, $3,600 in double rent, and attorney’s fees of $1,305, less a refund of a $1,200 security deposit that was not returned to the lessees. The lessees appeal this judgment.
Second, Property Owners argue that they complied with the requirements of section 535.300.3 because they either expended in some manner or returned all of Tenants’ security deposits. In support of that argument to the trial court, Property Owners...
...Bahn Realty Co. (lessor), appeals from the judgment of the trial court, in a court-tried case, in favor of plaintiff, Butler Hill Tavern, Inc. (lessee), on lessee’s claim for return of a security deposit and rent. We affirm.