Section 535
- Citation
- Section 535
- Parent Document
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1987-12-22
Other Sections in This Document (33)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Lastra v. Intercontinental Investments Co., 745 S.W.2d 703 (1987)
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
- Section 535
Full Text
754 charsWith their belongings in a U-Haul truck, appellants returned to Kansas City on May 29, 1984, and the next day Kim contacted Kintz as to the specific date they could move in. She was informed that the apartment would not be available until June 14. She told Kintz that the agreement was for June 4, and that she and her husband were staying in a motel and living out of the U-Haul. Kintz and the apartment manager told Kim that it was not possible1 to move in before June 14. Kim was referred to respondent’s president, Gibson, who refused the request for expenses and told her that the deposit was not being returned because it was being used for rent until the apartment was re-rented. The security deposit was eventually returned on September 23, 1985.