Skip to main content

Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 352625_pub.pdf

Citation
Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 352625_pub.pdf
Jurisdiction
Washington (state)
Source verification
official_capture_completeness_unverified

Full Text

1,718 chars
flexible. In general, an employee must provide 30 days’ advance notice of planned leave.

29 U.S.C. § 2612(e); 29 C.F.R. § 825.302(a); RCW 49.78.250. However, the

FMLA/WFLA recognize that 30 days advance notice is not always possible. In such

circumstances, an employee need only provide notice as soon as practicable. 29 U.S.C.

§ 2612(e); 29 C.F.R. § 825.302(a); RCW 49.78.250. When medical or family leave is

unforeseeable, no advance notice is required. 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.303(a), .305(b);

Lichtenstein v. Univ. of Pittsburg, 691 F.3d 294, 301 (3d Cir. 2012); Kauffman v. Fed.

15
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

No. 35262-5-III
Espindola v. Apple King

Express Corp., 426 F.3d 880, 885-86 (7th Cir. 2005).

When it comes to certain types of conditions, an employee’s obligations with

respect to content and timing of notice are intertwined. Maternity leave, for example, is

something generally governed by a 30-day notice requirement. RCW 49.78.250(1). 5 But

during the course of a woman’s pregnancy, the need for protected leave will sometimes

be unpredictable. See 29 C.F.R. § 825.120(a)(4). For example, an expectant mother

may find herself surprisingly debilitated by morning sickness. In such circumstances,

the FMLA/WFLA recognize the right to take unforeseeable protected leave, even when

such leave does not involve hospitalization or other direct medical supervision. 29 C.F.R.

§§ 825.115(f), .120(a)(4).

An employee’s notice obligations generally include compliance with an

employer’s internal notification procedures. 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.302(d), .303(c), .304.

For example, an employer may require written notice or that notice be directed to a