Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 341038_pub.pdf

Citation: Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 341038_pub.pdf
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Source verification: official_capture_completeness_unverified
Original Source: https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/341038_pub.pdf ↗

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,504 chars

Even now we don't have the resources to replenish first aid kits before
critical items are exhausted. My proposal would have generated a
MINIMUM of $21,000 dollars in the first semester, with the potential for
$40,000/semester by the beginning of 2014. This money would go backto
where it belongs, i.e., immediate student needs. Under the proposal we
could have paid for our own protective equipment in the gym and not have
to fight those in the chain of command to justify funding our safety
prov1s1ons.
3. An organizational restructuring so that the RFC and its manager,
in this case Jose Hernandez, have some autonomy, including disciplinary
actions, and reporting to a more appropriate supervisor than someone
overseeing "facilities." Facilities is not the appropriate department
overseeing student based programming. The RFC is so low on the chain of
command our staff is powerless to do our job safely and correctly, leading
to increased university liability and continuing student injuries. It is
important that I make you aware that our repeated safety concerns have
fallen on deaf ears. This is what prompted me to write the proposal in the
first place.

CP at 102.

David Martin's March 30 epistle thereafter described his hostile meeting with Joel

Morgan and Jose Hernandez, his suspension from employment, the need to directly

present his proposal to those higher on the chain of command, universal praise of his

plan, and fear that others would take credit for the plan. Martin continued: