Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 341038_pub.pdf

Citation: Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 341038_pub.pdf
Jurisdiction: Washington (state)
Source verification: official_capture_completeness_unverified
Original Source: https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/341038_pub.pdf ↗

Related Parts of This Source

Full Text

1,727 chars

1. Increased communication between athletic staff members who
oversee RFC operations/expenditures and the staff who run the RFC. This
would include monthly or quarterly joint staff meetings so that information
could flow between our two groups. One safety concern for example,
athletics could provide advanced notice of scheduled maintenance activities
such as refinishing Fieldhouse floors so that RFC employee schedules could
be adjusted to avoid prolonged exposure to flumes. These meetings would
also allow RFC staff to bring emergent issues to the attention of multiple
athletic staff members so that knowledge flowed up the chain of command
rather than to a singular person who normally ignores it, or gets back to us
far too late. Emergent safety concerns such as CPR/AED [cardiopulmonary
resuscitation/automated external defibrillator] certification, to which less
than 5 percent of the entire athletic department is certified (I witnessed this
at our all department staff meeting in August when we took a poll. Only
Steve Delong and I raised our hands[.] [T]his is out of 100+ people.)
2. Greater utilization of the swimming pool to generate funds so that
the RFC staff could address emergent safety issues. The perception, and
reality, is that repeated requests for safety improvements have gone
unaddressed under the current organizational structure. To remedy this I
proposed teaching WSI, CPR/AED & First Aid and Lifeguarding classes,
for which I am certified, so that the RFC does not have to "butt heads" over
purchases and that safety issues could be resolved rather than prolonged.

18
For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/.

No. 34103-8-III
Martin v. Gonzaga University