Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/323820.opn.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 323820.opn.pdf
Full Text
1,798 charsI business. Accordingly, partners of a partnership are not covered for unemployment
I
insurance purposes. WAC 192-300-190; RCW 50.40.100. While the department argues
that a party claiming an exemption from taxation bears the burden of proof (see Br. of
I Resp't at 13), DeFelice Dentistry does not rely on an exemption but on its position that an
owner's services are not "employment" under the Employment Security Act.
j
A partnership is an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a
business for profit; in Washington, at the time Drs. Armand, Loretta and Louise testify
they began to operate as partners, the formation of a partnership was governed by RCW
25.05.055. RCW 25.05.005(6). These are provisions of the RUPA, which was adopted
in Washington in 1998. LAWS OF 1998, ch. 103, § 1302.
Few reported Washington decisions apply the RUPA in determining whether
individuals have formed a partnership. Since RCW 25.05.904 provides that the RUPA
"shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law
with respect to the subject of the act among states enacting it" it is appropriate to look to
the official comments to the Uniform Partnership Act (1997), promulgated by the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, as aids in its
construction. Cf Townsend v. Quadrant Corp., 153 Wn. App. 870, 878 n.7, 224 P.3d
8
DeFelice v. Emp 't Sec. Dep't
No. 32382-0-III- dissent
818 (2009) (looking to comments to the uniform arbitration act as aids in construing the
Washington statute). RCW 25.05.904's command that the chapter be applied and
construed with a view to uniformity is also direct legislative authority for looking to case