Colonial Manor, Inc. v. Reyes (2026)

Citation: Colonial Manor, Inc. v. Reyes (2026)
Parent Document: Colonial Manor, Inc. v. Reyes (2026)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2026-05-19
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10861446/colonial-manor-inc-v-reyes/ ↗

Full Text

1,020 chars

1
          The complaint was filed by “Colonial Manor Inc.” and judgment was entered against
this entity. The notice of appeal, however, identifies plaintiff as “Colonial Manner, Inc.”
       2
           All further statutory references are to the Civil Code unless otherwise indicated.
       3
         The wording of the complaint conflicts with plaintiff’s position that there was no
tenancy relationship with defendant, and it is undisputed that defendant did not agree to pay
rent of $3,500.
       4
          The trial court, on defendant’s request and over plaintiff’s objection, found this case
was related to a tenant harassment action filed by the City against plaintiff, involving the same
attempted eviction of defendant. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300(a).) The tenant harassment
action was deemed to be the lead case. Some trial court documentation refers to the City as the
plaintiff and Colonial Manor, Inc. as the defendant; however, we use the party designations
from the unlawful detainer action.

Other Sections in This Document (27)

Full Text