Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Adamson Companies v. Zipp, 163 Cal. App. 3d 1 (1984)

Citation
Adamson Companies v. Zipp, 163 Cal. App. 3d 1 (1984)
Parent Document
Adamson Companies v. Zipp, 163 Cal. App. 3d 1 (1984)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1984-11-15

Other Sections in This Document (89)

Full Text

712 chars
In reaching the foregoing conclusion, we discharge our duty to promote the legislative intent, purpose and policy of the Mobilehome Residency Law, the Mobilehome Parks Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act. Our conclusion also effectuates the fundamental right of the young and elderly alike *24 to equal access to rental housing. (Cf. Marina Point, Ltd. v. Wolfson, supra, 30 Cal.3d at p. 744.) We recognize, however, that our decision may endanger plaintiff's right to continued operation of the Point Dume Mobile Home Park under the Los Angeles County Use Permit. In order to avoid any unjust ramifications to plaintiff, we urge the County of Los Angeles to revise its use permit in conformity with this opinion.