Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Adamson Companies v. Zipp, 163 Cal. App. 3d 1 (1984)

Citation
Adamson Companies v. Zipp, 163 Cal. App. 3d 1 (1984)
Parent Document
Adamson Companies v. Zipp, 163 Cal. App. 3d 1 (1984)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
1984-11-15

Other Sections in This Document (89)

Full Text

571 chars
The Point Dume leases recited as an assumption that occupancy would generally be limited to two persons per unit, unlike a "family park," where *8 the potential number of occupants is calculated on an assumption of four persons per home. Occupancy of any space was limited by the lease to the tenant and his or her spouse and his or her "adult" children. Under the lease and the park rules children could visit in a residence for up to two weeks in any calendar month and could otherwise generally visit at will.[8] B. The Facts Relating to Notice to the Nontenant Owners