Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

13315 Owners Corp. v. Kennedy, 4 Misc. 3d 931 (2004)

Citation
13315 Owners Corp. v. Kennedy, 4 Misc. 3d 931 (2004)
Parent Document
13315 Owners Corp. v. Kennedy, 4 Misc. 3d 931 (2004)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2004-06-29

Other Sections in This Document (76)

Full Text

836 chars
It is also possible that when the Court of Appeals referred to the “board” in Pullman, it meant a board’s taking actions required by a shareholder vote. Pullman’s proprietary lease was terminated under what is typically known in New York as paragraph 31 (g) of a proprietary lease. Paragraph 31 (g) calls for a shareholder vote to determine whether the “objectionable” tenant’s conduct merits lease termination. If, under paragraph 31 (g), a supermajority of the shareholders votes to terminate a lease, then the board may confirm the decision and begin an eviction proceeding. When the Court of Appeals discussed “the board’s determination” (Pullman, 100 NY2d at 153) or “board decisions” (id. at 155), it might have meant a board whose actions are based on a shareholder vote. Only time will write the perfect ending to this question.