Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)

Citation: Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
Parent Document: Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2017-07-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6319195/caldwell-v-928-gerard-avenue-partners/ ↗

Full Text

601 chars

With respect to the items whose value is not stated—clothes, jewelry, birth certificates, “social security,” family photos, plaintiff’s father’s artwork, and most troublingly, plaintiff’s cats, there is insufficient evidence in the record for the court to quantify additional damages. Similarly, with respect to plaintiffs claim that defendant purposely failed to reassign the utility bills to the latter, plaintiff’s exhibits (two pages of utility bills) are insufficient, on their own, to establish that additional charges were incurred by defendant rather than plaintiff (or her father). Conclusion

Other Sections in This Document (23)

Full Text