Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Citation
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Parent Document
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2017-07-12
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
- Caldwell v. 928 Gerard Avenue Partners, 57 Misc. 3d 857 (2017)
Full Text
653 charsMoshik Regev, defendant’s managing member, testified for defendant. Mr. Regev testified that defendant took ownership of the building on December 9, 2015, and confirmed that Housing Court ultimately found in plaintiff’s favor and restored plaintiff to possession of the apartment; according to Regev, “due to a technicality, because [defendant] took possession two days before the legal eviction took place” (tr 61:5-9, 73:14-19).6 Regev was not present when the marshal arrived to effectuate the eviction, but testified that Ran Haral, the minority owner of the building, and Rob Paulino, the property manager at the time, were present (tr 62:17-63:6).