Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Citation
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Parent Document
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2006-01-10
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
- Edge Management Consulting, Inc. v. Blank, 25 A.D.3d 364 (2006)
Full Text
716 charsOn August 12, 2003, the Blank Trust commenced a third-party action against Audrey Irmas, the owner of unit 9E, and 13 other parties who were involved in renovations of Irmas’s unit and the conversion of the building into condominiums. The Blank Trust claimed that the conditions of unit 8E were the sole fault of third-party defendants for their negligence in renovation and construction on unit 9E, failure to properly service, maintain and inspect the heating, ventilation and air conditioning in unit 9E, and negligence in renovation and construction of the building when it was converted into a condominium. The Trust claimed recovery under contribution, contractual indemnity, and common-law indemnity theories.