Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Citation
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Parent Document
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2020-01-30
Other Sections in This Document (18)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
- Sikora v. Shurtluff (2020)
Full Text
560 charsAt the outset, we note that we are mindful of the fact that, in its oral decision, the District Court specifically found, among other things, that defendant was entitled to a setoff of $1,000 due to damage to the floors. This setoff was not reflected in the original judgment, and there was no reference to it in the amended judgment or in the accompanying order amending the judgment. We give effect to the District Court's findings of fact in its oral decision, as opposed to the unexplained amounts awarded in the original judgment and the amended judgment.