Following the trial, the District Court ruled on the record, "After due deliberation and consideration . . . I find in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $450 representing the difference between the amount owed of $1450 plus the damages to the floor of a thousand dollars that's there. I order that the [final] judgment against [plaintiff] be vacated as satisfied." While it appears that the court meant to enter a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $450, a judgment was actually entered on July 20, 2018 in the amount of $1,950. While there is no indication in the record that the $1,450 nonpayment final judgment had previously been satisfied, it is undisputed in the parties' briefs that defendant had subsequently enforced that final judgment by levying against plaintiff's bank account to satisfy the final judgment in full.